P.p1 us see anything more than the

p. p1 {margin: 0. 0px 0. 0px 0.

0px 0. 0px; line-height: 21. 0px; font: 10.

0px Arial; color: #000000; -webkit-text-stroke: #000000; background-color: #ffffff}span. s1 {font-kerning: none}For the bundle theory of self ,  Hume asks what impressions give humans the concept of self. As humans we think of humans as stable characteristics that last over time. The way we look at our own experiences may never let us see anything more than the impressions, feelings and sensations we have .

We can’t look at ourselves in one way. There is no impression we can have that tie them together. In saying that , we can never be 100% aware of ourselves. We can only be aware of what we see and feel at any moment. Between our feelings and ideas, we may connect them through our memory, but at the end of the day there is no real hard evidence that connects them. This argument also comes along to the concept of our soul. Hume says that self is just a bundle of perceptions that are linked .

Hume fights that our concept of self is a result of our habits . This belief is most common , but there is no support for it . Hume doesn’t agree that reason plays anything in determining a role in encouraging or discouraging any actions . Instead, he believes that the game changer in human behavior is passion. As a example of proof, he asks us to look at human actions according to instrumentalism . This has to do actions serving the persons purpose or not . Most of the time they do not and that we tend to act out for some other motivation.

Based on these arguments, Hume ends off that reason cant be the only thing to motivate anyone. Rather, reason helps us make judgments. Therefore, reason does not make the basis of morality, it only acts as a advisor . On top of that , immorality is immoral. Not because it goes against reason but because it is not pleasing to us.

This argument angered the church and other religious philosophers who thought that God gave humans reason to discover and understand human morals . By removing reason, he denied God’s role as the source of morality.